Group 1: authorised in Germany
Every crypto-asset service provider authorised by BaFin under MiCAR is a provider in the sense of the KStTG (§ 1(2) and (10)) and is subject to the reporting duty. What it reports about you depends on the services it performs for you: exchanges and transfers are the reportable transactions (§ 1(16) and (22)). The table shows the providers private customers most likely use, with their services from the register as of 06.10.2026. The full register with all 100 authorisations is on the register page.
| Provider | Services per register | Authorised since |
|---|---|---|
| Trade Republic Bank GmbH | custody, execution of orders, reception and transmission of orders, transfer | 28.04.2025 |
| Scalable Capital Bank GmbH | advice | 02.03.2026 |
| N26 Bank SE | reception and transmission of orders | 14.05.2025 |
| Bitpanda Asset Management GmbH | custody, exchange for funds, exchange for crypto-assets, transfer | 24.01.2025 |
| EUWAX AG | exchange for funds, exchange for crypto-assets, execution of orders | 01.04.2025 |
| Boerse Stuttgart Digital Custody GmbH | custody, transfer | 17.01.2025 |
| flatexDEGIRO Bank AG | execution of orders | 04.04.2025 |
| Smartbroker AG | reception and transmission of orders | 11.08.2025 |
| Lang & Schwarz TradeCenter AG & Co. KG | exchange for funds, exchange for crypto-assets | 22.10.2025 |
| DZ BANK AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank | custody, execution of orders, transfer | 23.12.2025 |
| Commerzbank Aktiengesellschaft | custody, transfer | 07.04.2025 |
| Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft | custody, transfer | 12.10.2026 |
Reading aid: N26 Bank SE appears in the register with 'reception and transmission of orders'. N26 Krypto is, per N26, offered and custodied by Bitpanda Asset Management GmbH, which is registered for custody, exchange and transfer. The exchange, and so the report, sits with the executing provider. The same question pays off with every bank app: who executes the exchange?
All 100 providers authorised in Germany, with search and filter
Group 2: authorised elsewhere in the EU, active in Germany
A MiCAR authorisation is valid across the EU. These providers serve German customers under their home state's passport and report there. The report reaches the German tax administration through the exchange between authorities; the BZSt receives reports from partner states and forwards them (§ 16 KStTG). Home state and date of first authorisation from the ESMA register, read on 22.10.2026.
| Brand | Authorised entity | Home state | Authorised since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coinbase | Coinbase Luxembourg S.A. | LU | 20.06.2025 |
| Kraken | Payward Europe Solutions Limited | IE | 25.06.2025 |
| Bitpanda | Bitpanda GmbH | AT | 09.04.2025 |
| Bitvavo | Bitvavo B.V. | NL | 26.06.2025 |
| Revolut | Revolut Digital Assets (Europe) Ltd | CY | 20.10.2025 |
| eToro | eToro (Europe) Ltd | CY | 16.01.2025 |
| Crypto.com | Foris DAX MT Limited | MT | 27.01.2025 |
| OKX | OKX Europe Limited | MT | 27.01.2025 |
| Bybit | Bybit EU GmbH | AT | 28.05.2025 |
| KuCoin | KuCoin EU Exchange GmbH | AT | 27.11.2025 |
Not in the ESMA register as of 06.10.2026: Binance. A provider without an EU authorisation may not serve customers in the EU since 1 July 2026; whether and where it reports follows the state of its authorisation, not the KStTG.
Group 3: apps on another firm's licence
Many cards and apps hold no authorisation of their own. The account, the IBAN or the exchange comes from a partner that holds it. The report then comes from that partner, for the customers it onboarded on EU documents. Two checked examples: N26 Krypto runs through Bitpanda Asset Management GmbH (above). Gnosis Pay's IBAN is, per Gnosis Pay, issued by Monerium, an e-money institution; Gnosis Pay itself is not in the CASP register. The question for every app is the same: who holds the authorisation for the service I use?
Outside: your own wallet
A wallet whose keys you hold yourself has no provider and is reported by nobody. Two limits: if you exchange inside the wallet through a built-in service, the operator of that service is the question. And the tax liability on gains exists whether or not anyone reports; the KStTG governs the report, not the tax.
The two errors going round
- 'From 2026 every crypto holder is transparent.' 2026 is the first year recorded. The report for it reaches the BZSt by 31 July 2027 and the tax office after that. And it covers users of providers, not everyone who holds crypto-assets.
- 'As a holder you must register with the authority.' Crypto-asset operators without an EU authorisation must register (§ 17 KStTG), not users. You give the self-certification to your provider. A letter or mail that sends you to a portal by link or QR code is the fraud described on the fake DAC8 letter page.
The fake DAC8 letter: how to recognise it
Frequent questions
From when am I 'transparent'?
Does my provider report me, or only totals?
My provider is in Luxembourg or Ireland. Does the German tax office learn of it?
What happens if I do not provide the self-certification?
Will the BZSt write to me?
Sources: Kryptowerte-Steuertransparenzgesetz (KStTG), gesetze-im-internet.de, read on 22.10.2026, §§ 1, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, 18, 21. ESMA register of crypto-asset service providers (Art. 109 MiCAR), as of 06.10.2026, normalised in our CASP register. N26: n26.com/de-de/krypto, read on 22.10.2026. Gnosis Pay: help.gnosispay.com, read on 22.10.2026. This page is not advice; your Steuerberater is responsible for your tax return.